• By Kevin Hecteman •
With one house of Congress set to flip to Democratic control next year, agricultural advocates focused on a post-election, “lame-duck” session as an opportunity to resolve lingering issues including farm policy and budget appropriations.
Josh Rolph, federal policy manager for the California Farm Bureau Federation, says Congress needs to work immediately on appropriations bills. A current omnibus extension ends Dec. 7, and without a new one, the government will shut down.
Farm Bill A Priority
Also at stake is the 2018 Farm Bill, which has been stalled in Congress mainly due to stricter work requirements for food-assistance recipients, which was included in the House version of the bill but not in the Senate bill.
Rolph says he thinks the lame-duck session could try to resolve the Farm Bill before the new Congress is seated Jan. 3, 2019.
“The best-case scenario for agriculture is a Farm Bill passed this Congress in the lame-duck session,” he says.
California farmers and ranchers, he says, participate most actively in Farm Bill programs that have had their funding lapse.
“We rely on conservation funding, research funding, specialty-crop programs,” Rolph says. “It’s not a direct payment to a farmer, but there’s an indirect benefit from those programs. None of those are being worked on right now.”
Compromise Is Important
House Republicans, with the support of the White House, favored the new work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, but most Senate Republicans balked, and a compromise has not been reached. With Democrats set to take over the House, Republicans have an incentive to compromise.
Andrew Walmsley, director of congressional relations for the American Farm Bureau Federation, says he has heard that Farm Bill negotiations are close to wrapping up, making passage before the end of the year more likely. If the Farm Bill can’t be finalized during the lame-duck session, Rolph says, the incoming House majority will likely want to write its own bill. Walmsley says he has been told legislative leaders are not considering a possible extension of the previous Farm Bill.
“They are intending to get this done,” he says. “That’s going to be key for farmers and ranchers, our grassroots members, making sure their member of Congress knows how important this is. They need to be applying pressure to leadership to hopefully have a conference report and a vote here in the next couple of weeks to get this done.”
“The lame-duck session does offer Republicans one last chance to push through the Goodlatte bill,” Rolph says.
He says CFBF would oppose that, because of flaws in the bill regarding an insufficient number of visas and a “touchback” requirement, with no guarantee of return, for immigrant agricultural employees already in the United States.
If Congress proceeds with immigration legislation during the lame-duck session, Rolph says, CFBF would seek to negotiate agricultural provisions “that work for California agriculture.”
If no action is taken before Jan. 3, Rolph says, indications from Capitol Hill are that immigration is not high on House Democrats’ priority list. The thinking is that any action on immigration during 2019 would originate in the Senate, where Republicans boosted their majority.
Modifications to the federal Endangered Species Act seem unlikely to move forward in a new Democrat-controlled House, Rolph says, which could prompt an effort to craft a compromise in the lame-duck session. On water issues, Erin Huston, a CFBF federal policy consultant, says a new Waters of the United States, or WOTUS, rule is anticipated before the end of the month.
Once the new Congress opens in January, Rolph says, members will essentially have a year to act on policies before presidential politics intrude.
Kevin Hecteman is an assistant editor of California Farm Bureau Federation’s Ag Alert.