• By Tom Allen and Darrin Dodds •
During 2018, the cotton OVT (official variety trial) at Lucedale and Stoneville was evaluated for the response to target spot. Natural infection occurred during the season and plots were evaluated for the presence (incidence), severity and defoliation as a result of target spot.
Evaluations were made a single time at each location in an attempt to determine the differences between varieties at each location. Target spot was evaluated by observing the level of disease within each of the plots (incidence) as well as the percentage of the leaf surface area of those leaves exhibiting disease (severity).
In addition to observations of the incidence and severity of target spot, the percent defoliation in each of the plots was assessed at the time of evaluations. One additional evaluation was made from each plot to consider the number of bolls on the ground (or boll shed) as a result of target spot.
Other states that are making observations on target spot incidence and severity between varieties have indicated that variety response may differ between locations.
Considering the two locations evaluated during 2018 there appear to be differences between varieties if you consider the greatest and least amount of defoliation as well as incidence and severity of disease. The varieties also differed in those entries that produced the lowest and greatest yield.
These types of data suggest there may be differences between the micro-environment at locations that experience severe target spot as well as possible differences in the fungal population present that may relate to disease incidence and severity. Additional observations are warranted over multiple seasons to create a list of susceptible and resistant varieties.
Defoliation as a result of target spot
Defoliation categories as created based on the Lucedale OVT data. Bold numbers on each bar indicate the number of varieties within a given category. The minimum and maximum yield values for the varieties within each category are at the top of the figure in the table.
In general, disease severity was lower in 2018 (4 – 13.8) at the two locations than observed in 2017 (1.5 – 23.8) suggesting a different environment between the two seasons. Similar to the 2017 data from Lucedale (http://www.mississippi-crops.com/2018/01/27/cotton-target-spot-2017-lucedale-ovt-disease-rating-results/), one way to look at these data was to create defoliation categories, to present the frequency of varieties within each category based on percent defoliation.
To this end, seven defoliation categories were derived based on a compilation of all of the data from the two locations (0-10, 10-20, 20+30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60+). Essentially, comparing the entries within each assigned category with regards to yield could provide information as to the amounts of percent defoliation necessary for yield reductions to occur as a result of target spot. By grouping varieties within classes, based on ranges of defoliation, one would hope to gather some valuable information regarding the response of varieties that were observed to perform in a similar fashion.
The average of all varieties (from both locations, n=57 entries ×2 locations = 114 total entries) was 44.2%. However, take the information in the associated figure with a grain of salt.
In some cases, the range of yield between varieties in the assigned classes is quite large. The minimum and maximum yield for the varieties in each classification are presented in the table at the top of the figure. Based on these data (one year, two locations) it is difficult to make assumptions with a limited number of observations (locations), in this case varieties (or locations), within a given classification.
The number of varieties within each defoliation category are included as the bold number on each bar. However, if yield can be related to defoliation based on these classifications it appears that some varieties may be more able to tolerate the disease than others.
But, with all of that said, more observations are necessary to determine the differences between target spot susceptible and target spot resistant varieties.
This article first appeared on the mississippi-crops.com website. Dr. Tom Allen is an Extension plant pathologist at Mississippi State University’s Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville. He may be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Dr. Darrin Dodds is MSU Extension cotton specialist based in Starkville. He may be reached at email@example.com