Kansas State University researchers are evaluating the impact of non-target injury from dicamba herbicide on non-resistant soybeans. The hope is to help producers lessen or avoid the unintended damage that was seen in some of the state’s fields the past two years.
Their work comes on the heels of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently renewing its registration of XtendiMax, FeXapan and Engenia. These are the three dicamba herbicides approved to be sprayed on tolerant (Xtend) varieties of soybeans and cotton. Non-tolerant soybeans are extremely susceptible to dicamba, causing injury to plant leaves and reduced yields.
Timing Is Everything
“The critical factor is when and how we use the dicamba,” says Dallas Peterson, a weed management specialist with K-State Research and Extension.
Peterson conducted the work with colleague Vipan Kumar, a scientist at the Agricultural Research Center in Hays, and graduate student Tyler Meyeres. Among their findings, they were able to confirm that injury to soybeans was at its lowest level when dicamba was applied during the vegetative growth phase.
“Just because you see injury doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re going to see yield loss,” Peterson says. “However, that still doesn’t make it right; we still don’t want to have to worry about non-target injury.”
Follow Label Directions
He adds that researchers strongly suggest producers closely follow label directions when applying dicamba, and “be aware of surrounding susceptible crops and plants to minimize the potential for off-target movement.”“In fact, producers shouldn’t even spray the products if the wind is blowing in the direction of neighboring fields or areas with susceptible crops and plants,” he says.
Peterson notes that soybean injury and resulting yield loss was much higher when beans were exposed to dicamba during the reproductive phases, which was an expected finding. That was also the case when fields were exposed to dicamba applications multiple times during a growing season.
“When there were multiple exposures of soybeans to dicamba, crop injury and yield loss increased dramatically,” Peterson says.
For example, in a research setting, when the K-State group exposed soybeans to 1 percent of a typical field-use rate at all three growth stages, soybean yield was reduced by nearly 70 percent. The researchers also evaluated dicamba rates of 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent the normal field use rate. Peterson said soybean yield loss from those rates was much less than at the 1 percent rate and often not significant.
“Unfortunately, injury symptoms on soybeans can occur at rates down to 0.005 percent and it’s impossible to know what the exposure rate was,” he says.
“Dicamba has been beneficial from a weed control standpoint. But we don’t want to rely just on dicamba or we’ll have the same problems with resistance to dicamba that we experienced with glyphosate. So good stewardship and using an integrated weed management program is extremely important.”
He says that producers should “communicate with your neighbors, follow the application guidelines and make good judgments when you apply and how you apply dicamba products.”
Kansas State University Research and Extension provided this article.